DONATE

Sunday, August 28, 2016

The Anti-Hillary





In this latest submission from Justin Smith, he expands upon his Facebookthoughts in which I cross posted entitled, “Memo to Third Party and ‘Never Trump’ Thinkers”. I concur with Justin that for Conservatives to stay home on election day or to vote for a Third Party candidate is the EXACT same thing as placing a check mark next to Crooked Hillary’s name on the ballot in November. Justin thus expands this theme.

JRH 8/28/16



*******************
The Anti-Hillary

By Justin O. Smith
Sent 8/27/2016 1:46 PM

Donald Trump may not be the strong constitutionalist that many conservatives saw in Ted Cruz. Still, we can acknowledge Trump's abundant flaws, his Big Government Leftist leanings, just as I have done in several columns, and vote for him with a clear conscience, since a corrupt society gave us both Trump and Hillary Clinton. Save the political infighting over "true conservative values" for after the election. We are not responsible for Trump's shortcomings; but, we can certainly take advantage of his known strengths, as we unify against Hillary Clinton, who is an evil ideologue hell-bent on the abolition of individual and religious liberties, the most corrupt elitist to ever seek the presidency.

Hurt feelings or not, the intransigent "never Trump" conservatives appear to be throwing a politically immature toddler-like temper tantrum. Reveling in their false pride, their patriotism questionable, they point to Trump's assertion he could survive without them, while they endanger our republic by still refusing to vote for Trump, who is the only candidate with a real chance of beating Clinton. They bring Hillary Clinton one vote closer to the White House and the Clinton Foundation ever closer to its next billions in "donations" [bribes] from foreign governments, forcing the Founding Fathers' edifice ever closer to becoming a banana republic.

Morally speaking, everyone, including "never Trump" groups and conservative Democrats, must look at which candidate will preserve human rights, our unalienable rights under the U.S. Constitution. Which candidate will best protect our right to free speech, property ownership, self-defense and life that natural law and reason guarantees all human beings?

Hillary Clinton is a political chameleon, changing position as the situation demands __ pro and anti-free trade [TPP], anti and pro-raising the minimum wage and anti and pro-same sex marriage. Her consistent views are shameful. She met with 57 Islamic nations in December of 2012 in New York to discuss how best to induce the Senate and the House to criminalize any criticism of Islam, a blatant attack on free speech. And during her presidential campaign, Clinton has warned abortion opponents moved by faith that their "religious beliefs" would "have to be changed."

On June 21st, 2016, Donald Trump met with hundreds of Christian leaders in New York City [A Conversation with Donald Trump], where he gave extremely encouraging answers to the tough questions posed by nearly 1000 evangelical and Catholic leaders. He pledged to always appoint pro-life, pro-Second Amendment and pro-religious liberty judges and Supreme Court Justices, and he promised to eradicate the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which unconstitutionally silences pastors from the pulpit on issues of the day.

Clinton will be a full scale disaster. Along with her pro-Death [abortion] comments, she has already been clear about her intentions to succeed in disarming Americans. She will appoint a fifth Supreme Court Justice to gut the First and Second Amendments. She'll further cripple our military, and she'll force American industry to bow to her will through tax ploys and the regulatory infrastructure.

Leftist indoctrination of two generations of Americans, through our universities, has moved the Democratic Party far left of many European socialist parties; so much so that Hillary Clinton feels comfortable enough to brazenly suggest that her government will dictate to companies how much employees must be paid. Can you say "unconstitutional"? How about "fascist"?

Trump's proposals to undo the immense tax and regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, the job creators, will bring many old businesses back into the U.S., along with new businesses. Money currently outside the U.S. will return, and the result will be an economy that will benefit all Americans, if they are willing to work.

Concerning the Supreme Court, Donald Trump has sought the guidance of the conservative Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation, as he notes that these well respected think tanks have set "the gold standard" on judicial appointments. These think tanks helped him list 11 judges with the judicial temperament and constitutional knowledge that we can expect from any of his potential nominees to any federal court or the Supreme Court.

If Hillary Clinton is elected, she'll bury every one of her and Bill's secrets and settle old scores with her enemies. Her agenda and the Progressive agenda is at stake, from Uranium One and donors like Gilbert Chougary and advocating unnecessary wars like Libya to Obamacare, the Iran Nuclear Deal and more potential unConstitutional Executive Orders, which is great motivation for the vast left-wing Clinton apparatus to fight to retain the levers of government power.

Unlike Obama's "experts" in the DOJ and the CIA and Hillary's State Department, Trump takes a more pragmatic approach to governance. He will encourage law enforcement policies that make U.S. cities safe for all regardless of color or ethnicity in opposition to progressive policies of division. He correctly sees the Islamic State as a bigger problem than Assad, where Obama and Hillary failed. He doesn't mind re-evaluating allegiances that have been taken for granted, and he has castigated U.S. ally Mexico for its lack of border controls and the flood of illegal aliens into America. He has also said that Saudi Arabia would have to do more in the fight against the Islamic State, which would be a significant change from the Saudis' prominent role in funding terrorism against the West.

Hillary Clinton policies vary only slightly from Obama's. If Obama's progressive policies had been proper and backed by action over the past seven years, would we now have such racial and ethnic strife in America? Would the Islamic State's diseased brutality persist? Would America's middle class be disintegrating? Hillary will give America four more years of Obama's malaise and defective, negligent, incompetent and treasonous government.

I'm not voting for Trump to be my new best friend. I'm voting for him to be the Anti-Hillary. I don't care if he's mean and hurts the tender feelings of the fey and fainthearted, or even if he grows fangs and fur every full moon. I know Hillary Clinton is a worse person who would be unrestrained in power and pose a significant chance of plunging America into violence.

Donald Trump's nationalist populism is not the death knell to conservative values that several conservative Christian pundits will have one believe. His current proposed policies will actually serve as a breastwork against all of Obama's policies and terrible legislative legacy and Hillary's planned radical destruction. Trump is a strong advocate, by and large, for the GOP platform, which contains mostly traditional conservative positions, and placing Trump in the Oval Office will prevent Hillary Clinton's undoing of America, the destruction of the U.S. Constitution and America's transformation into a godless neo-Marxist banana republic.

By Justin O. Smith
___________________
Edited by John R. Houk

© Justin O. Smith

Saturday, August 27, 2016

BENGHAZI DOCUMENTS Found in Deleted Hillary Clinton Email





Thanks largely to Judicial Watch, some Benghazi Documents that were a part of Crooked Hillary’s erased emails have been located by the State Department. Crooked Hillary exposed as a liar yet AGAIN!

JRH 8/27/16 (Hat Tip: G+ Conservative Union)


********************
BREAKING: BENGHAZI DOCUMENTS Found in Deleted Hillary Clinton Email Files: State Dept

Aug 25th, 2016 6:04 pm



The State Department revealed Benghazi related material was found in searches of the approximately 14,900 deleted Hillary Clinton emails recovered by the FBI that were sent to State as potentially work-related.

In March 2015 Hillary Clinton said she chose to delete only her personal emails:

“E-mails about planning Chelsea’s wedding or my mother’s funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends, as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes. No one wants their personal e-mails made public, and I think most people understand that and respect that privacy.”




But that was not true.

The news that Benghazi docs are in the deleted Clinton emails was contained in an August 23 court filing in a Freedom of Information Act case about the 2012 Benghazi terror attack filed by Judicial Watch.

Defendant Department of State (“State”) submits this status report to (1) update the Court on its search for records potentially responsive to FOIA Request 1 among information transferred from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) to State, and (2) propose a production schedule for the non-exempt portions of responsive documents subject to FOIA.

1. FOIA Request 1 seeks “[a]ny and all emails of former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton concerning, regarding, or relating to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.” Complaint ¶ 5 (ECF No. 1). To date, State has produced to Plaintiff, via its FOIA web site and via email, a total of 343 documents responsive to FOIA Request 1, with redactions as appropriate

4. State is currently working to determine whether any of the documents that satisfied the search terms are agency records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request. It must then review those documents to determine what, if any, exempt information must be withheld from the responsive documents. Accordingly, State proposes a rolling production schedule, under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.”

Judicial Watch issued a press release on several orders in its FOIA cases regarding Clinton’s secret email server.

Court Orders New Clinton Email Production by September 13

State Admits Benghazi Material in New Cache of Emails Clinton Failed to Produce

(Washington DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that a federal court has ordered the State Department to review newly found Clinton emails and turn over responsive records by September 13. And, in two other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the State Department is scheduled to release additional emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s non-state.gov email system beginning September 30. In a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.

The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued today in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)). Today’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. The court ruled:

The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.

In a separate case, Judicial Watch has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed. A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).

After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.” Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable. Today, U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30.

Judicial Watch is also scheduled to receive documents from the State Department in a case arising out of FOIA lawsuit before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). Judge Sullivan has now issued a court order stating:

[T]he State Department shall release all remaining documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act request by no later than September 30, 2016.

The 14,900 new Clinton emails were uncovered as a result of separate Judicial Watch litigation seeking all of Mrs. Clinton’s work related emails. At a status hearing this week, U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the State Department to report to the Court the volume of documents reviewed and be prepared to commit to a production schedule at a further status hearing on September 23, 2016.

“It is astonishing that Hillary Clinton tried to delete and hide Benghazi emails and documents. No wonder federal courts in Florida and DC are ordering the State Department to stop stalling and begin releasing the 14,900 new Clinton emails,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.”

_________________
2016 theGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.

About The Gateway Pundit

In late 2004 I started The Gateway Pundit blog after the presidential election. At that time I had my twin brother Joe and my buddy Chris as regular readers. A lot has changed since then.

Today The Gateway Pundit is a leading right-of-center news website. The Gateway Pundit has 6-7 million visits (Stat Counter – Google Analytics). It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, The Drudge Report, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations.

Jim Hoft was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013. Jim Hoft received the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2015.

Not everyone appreciates our success.

Jim Hoft is active in the Tea Party and was the associate producer of Hating Breitbart. He has a devotion to growing democracy and freedom movements everywhere, from READ THE REST